Skip to content

MRI · Dog · Spinal cord

Spinal cord MRI for acute non-painful myelopathy in dogs

How MRI separates fibrocartilaginous embolism from acute non-compressive disc extrusion in dogs, when to scan, and which lesion measurements predict outcome.

Clinical question: A dog suddenly became paretic or plegic, often during exercise, and is not getting worse. Is this fibrocartilaginous embolism or a non-compressive disc extrusion, and what can MRI add to the prognosis?

Stylised illustration of a dog's body in profile with translucent MRI slice planes over the spine
Illustration, not a diagnostic image.

Two conditions that look the same at the door

Fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy (FCEM) and acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE) both cause a peracute onset (less than 6 hours) of spinal cord dysfunction that is generally non-progressive after the first 24–48 hours, according to a review of both conditions (De Risio, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2015). Onset during running, jumping or play is common in both, and so is vocalisation at onset.

Both can usually be told apart from compressive disc extrusion, fracture, myelitis and neoplasia. Telling them apart from each other is harder. Ante-mortem diagnosis rests largely on MRI, and treatment of both is conservative. In practice, MRI therefore does two jobs:

Clinical clues before the scan

The review lists these clues:

  • Age. FCEM occurs in immature and adult animals. ANNPE has been reported only in animals older than 1 year.
  • Site. ANNPE most often affects the disc spaces between T12 and L2. FCEM has no such site predilection.
  • Pain. Spinal hyperalgesia in the first days is uncommon in FCEM and was reported in 21–57% of dogs with ANNPE.

In 51 dogs with ischaemic myelopathy and 42 with ANNPE at one hospital (Fenn et al., Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2016), dogs with ANNPE were older and more likely to vocalise at onset, to have spinal hyperaesthesia, to have a C1–C5 lesion and to be ambulatory at discharge. Dogs with ischaemic myelopathy were more likely to have an L4–S3 lesion.

MRI features that separate the two

The patterns below come from the review unless another study is linked.

FeatureFCEMANNPE
Position of the intramedullary T2 hyperintensityOften over a vertebral body: 94% of lesions called ischaemic myelopathy were (Fenn et al., Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound)Over an intervertebral disc space: 85% of lesions called ANNPE were
Length on T2-weighted imagesGenerally longer than one vertebral lengthGenerally less than one vertebral length
Affected discNot part of the described patternNucleus pulposus smaller with lower T2 signal; disc space often narrowed
Epidural spaceNot part of the described patternMaterial or signal change dorsal to the disc in some dogs
Post-contrast T1Mild heterogeneous enhancement possible, generally on days 5–7Usually none; meningeal enhancement was associated with ANNPE in one study

The FCEM lesion is typically focal, relatively sharply demarcated, often lateralised and mainly in the grey matter.

How reliable is the call?

Anecdotal reports suggest the distinction is harder with low-field MRI, suboptimal image definition and limited neuroimaging experience.

Spinal cord MRI protocol at a glance

The lesion position, length and cross-sectional area are judged on T2-weighted images in sagittal and transverse planes. Timing matters: MRI 24–72 hours after onset may show no intraparenchymal change in a dog with FCEM, and a repeat scan 72 hours or more after onset may reveal the lesion. Diffusion-weighted imaging has increased sensitivity for spinal cord infarction in the early stages, but is technically challenging in the spine.

What the radiologist looks at

Beyond the features in the table, the reader measures the lesion, because its size predicts outcome:

MeasureIschaemic myelopathy, 50 dogsANNPE, 42 dogs
Lesion length to vertebral length ratio (sagittal T2)Above 2.0: 100% sensitivity for an unsuccessful outcomeSagittal extent associated with outcome on univariable analysis
Lesion cross-sectional area on transverse T267% or more: 100% sensitivity for an unsuccessful outcomeBest single predictor of outcome on multivariable analysis
  • Specificity is modest. The review lists the specificity of the ischaemic myelopathy cut-offs as 62% and 52%, and, for ANNPE, a cross-sectional area of 90% or more as 86% sensitive and 96% specific for an unsuccessful outcome.
  • Gradient echo signal. In the ANNPE series, intramedullary hypointensity on gradient echo images was also associated with outcome on univariable analysis, and 67% of dogs had a successful outcome.
  • A third possibility. Intradural or intramedullary disc extrusion is rarer. A linear tract from the disc into the cord, hypointense on T2*-weighted gradient echo images, is highly suggestive of it.

What your report will include

Every Veheri case is read by a radiologist or neurologist, and when you order you can choose Diplomate-only reporting or the full specialist panel. Neurology reporting covers CT and MRI. You can chat directly with the specialist assigned to your case, and a simplified pet owner report helps you explain the findings to the owner.

When you take the report forward:

What to include when you request a spinal MRI report

  • signalment: age, breed and sex
  • the time of onset and the time from onset to scan
  • activity or trauma at onset, and any vocalisation
  • whether signs progressed after the first 24–48 hours
  • neurolocalisation, lateralisation and spinal pain on examination
  • pain perception in the affected limbs

How Veheri can help

Veheri works with veterinary radiologists and neurologists and reports spinal MRI studies remotely for clinics. For compressive disc disease, see MRI of the canine thoracolumbar spine, and for cats, spinal cord MRI in cats.

Sources

Each claim in this guide links to its source. The full citations:

  • De Risio L. A review of fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy and different types of peracute non-compressive intervertebral disk extrusions in dogs and cats. Front Vet Sci. 2015;2:24. doi:10.3389/fvets.2015.00024
  • De Risio L, Adams V, Dennis R, et al. Association of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings with outcome in dogs suspected to have ischemic myelopathy: 50 cases (2000-2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;233(1):129-35. doi:10.2460/javma.233.1.129
  • De Risio L, Adams V, Dennis R, McConnell FJ. Association of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings with outcome in dogs with presumptive acute noncompressive nucleus pulposus extrusion: 42 cases (2000-2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009;234(4):495-504. doi:10.2460/javma.234.4.495
  • Fenn J, Drees R, Volk HA, De Decker S. Comparison of clinical signs and outcomes between dogs with presumptive ischemic myelopathy and dogs with acute noncompressive nucleus pulposus extrusion. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016;249(7):767-75. doi:10.2460/javma.249.7.767
  • Fenn J, Drees R, Volk HA, De Decker S. Inter- and intraobserver agreement for diagnosing presumptive ischemic myelopathy and acute noncompressive nucleus pulposus extrusion in dogs using magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 57(1):33-40 (published online 2015). doi:10.1111/vru.12289
  • Specchi S, Johnson P, Beauchamp G, et al. Assessment of interobserver agreement and use of selected magnetic resonance imaging variables for differentiation of acute noncompressive nucleus pulposus extrusion and ischemic myelopathy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016;248(9):1013-21. doi:10.2460/javma.248.9.1013
  • Mari L, Behr S, Shea A, et al. Outcome comparison in dogs with a presumptive diagnosis of thoracolumbar fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy and acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion. Vet Rec. 2017;181(11):293. doi:10.1136/vr.104090
  • Togawa G, Lewis MJ, Devathasan D. Outcome in paraplegic dogs with or without pain perception due to thoracolumbar fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy or acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion. Front Vet Sci. 2024;11:1406843. doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1406843
All imaging guides
Stylised illustration of a cat's body in profile with translucent MRI slice planes along the spine

Spinal cord

Spinal cord MRI in cats with myelopathy

How MRI separates lymphoma, FIP myelitis, ischaemic myelopathy and disc disease in cats with myelopathy, and where CSF and biopsy are still needed.

Stylised illustration of a dog's head in profile with translucent MRI slice planes over the top of the head

Brain

Brain MRI for dogs with seizures

Which dogs with seizures need brain MRI, what the evidence says about diagnostic yield, what the radiologist looks for and what your report will include.